Article ID: CBB000953573

Drug Evaluation and the Permissive Principle: Continuities and Contradictions between Standards and Practices in Antidepressant Regulation (2009)

unapi

Pharmaceuticals are not permitted on to the market unless they are granted regulatory approval. The regulatory process is, therefore, crucial in whether or not a drug is widely prescribed. Regulatory agencies have developed standards of performance that pharmaceuticals are supposed to meet before entering the market. Regulation of technologies is often discussed by reference to the precautionary principle. In contrast, this paper develops the concept of the `permissive principle' as a way of understanding the departure of regulators' practices from standards of drug efficacy to which regulatory agencies themselves subscribe. By taking a case study of antidepressant regulation in the UK and the USA, the mechanisms of permissive regulatory practices are examined. An STS methodology of both spatial (international) and temporal comparisons of regulatory practices with regulatory standards is employed to identify the nature and extent of the permissive regulation. It is found that the permissive principle was adopted by drug regulators in the UK and the USA, but more so by the former than the latter. Evidently, permissive regulation, which favours the commercial interests of the drug manufacturer, but is contrary to the interests of patients, may penetrate to the heart of regulatory science. On the other hand, permissive regulation of specific drugs should not be regarded as an inevitable result of marketing strategies and concomitant networks deployed by powerful pharmaceutical companies, because the extent of permissive regulation may vary according to the intra-institutional normative commitments of regulators to uphold their technical standards against the commercial interests of the manufacturer. Likely sociological factors that can account for such permissive regulatory practices are `corporate bias', secrecy and excessive regulatory trust in the pharmaceutical industry in the UK, political expediency and ideological capture in the USA, combined in both countries with some regulatory deference to the clinical autonomy of the psychiatry profession.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB000953573/

Similar Citations

Article Horwitz, Allan V.; (2011)
Naming the Problem That Has No Name: Creating Targets for Standardized Drugs (/isis/citation/CBB001221532/)

Article McGoey, Linsey; (2010)
Profitable Failure: Antidepressant Drugs and the Triumph of Flawed Experiments (/isis/citation/CBB000953791/)

Article Koichi Mikami; (2019)
Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy (/isis/citation/CBB788431131/)

Chapter Daemmrich, A.; Greene, J.; (2010)
From Visible Harm to Relative Risk: Centralization and Fragmentation of Pharmacovigilance (/isis/citation/CBB001221031/)

Article Hersch, Matthew H.; (2008)
“Calm, But Still Alert”: Marketing Stelazine to Disturbed America, 1958--1980 (/isis/citation/CBB000932029/)

Book Tone, Andrea; (2009)
The Age of Anxiety: A History of America's Turbulent Affair with Tranquilizers (/isis/citation/CBB000951137/)

Article Daemmrich, A.; (2007)
Pharmaceutical Regulation in the United States and Europe (/isis/citation/CBB001221028/)

Thesis Metzl, Jonathan Michel; (2001)
The Freud of Prozac: Tracing psychotropic medications through American culture, 1955-2001 (/isis/citation/CBB001562624/)

Article Buerki, Robert A.; (2008)
The Conscience Clause in American Pharmacy: An Historical Overview (/isis/citation/CBB000932021/)

Article Brushwood, David B.; (2009)
Recent Trends in Pharmacy Law and Regulation (/isis/citation/CBB000933447/)

Article Fraser, Mariam; (2001)
The nature of Prozac (/isis/citation/CBB000101711/)

Authors & Contributors
Daemmrich, A.
Mikami, Koichi
Tone, Andrea
Sihn, Kyu-hwan
Pieters, Toine
Metzl, Jonathan Michel
Journals
Pharmacy in History
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Social History of Medicine
History of the Human Sciences
Korean Journal of Medical History
Focus on Law Studies
Publishers
Iowa State University
New York University Press
Basic Books
Yale University
University of Minnesota
University of Michigan
Concepts
Pharmacy
Psychotropic drugs
Pharmaceutical industry
Legislative and administrative regulations
Medicine and government
Depression
Time Periods
20th century, late
21st century
19th century
Places
United States
Great Britain
Germany
Europe
Korea
Institutions
United States. Food and Drug Administration
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment