Abstract This paper is the second of a multi-part examination of the creation of the Babylonian mathematical lunar theories known as Systems A and B. Part I (Britton 2007) addressed the development of the empirical elements needed to separate the effects of lunar and solar anomaly on the intervals between syzygies. This was accomplished in the construction of the System A lunar theory by an unknown author, almost certainly in the city of Babylon and probably early in the 4th century B.C. The present paper focuses mainly on System A and the likely process of its construction. The first three sections are largely descriptive -- first of the basic concepts which underlie the theory; then of the component schemes comprising the theory; and finally of two distinctive texts which suggest how the theory was constructed. The crux of the paper is Sect. 4, which describes how the theory seems likely to have been constructed. Here the crucial insight in separating the effects of lunar and solar anomaly appears to have been recognizing that -- of all the measurable intervals bounded by eclipses -- only 235 months exhibits a variation due solely to lunar anomaly, and that by means of an elegant mathematical model the amplitudes of 223 and 12 months could be deduced from its amplitude. The rest of the section describes the likely details of the derivation of the F ~ ? scheme, and the extension of the methodology to the other components of the theory. It concludes with a demonstration that F and its dependent schemes were anchored through the F ~ W scheme to the syzygy on --403 Aug 18 (GN 7391) which concluded the shortest 6-month interval in the first 24 saros cycles since --746 (and in fact in the 900 years separating Nabonassar and Ptolemy). The next three sections address a number of largely technical details and amplifications of the theory, beginning with the schemes describing the variation of lunar velocity (column F) in Sect. 5. Section 6 addresses issues concerning the interpretation of F and the so-call Saros Text (BM 36705), while Sect. 7 discusses System B's corresponding treatment of the effects of lunar anomaly, illustrating both its derivative nature and mathematically less rigorous structure. Section 8 examines the accuracy of the two theories, showing that the System A theory was both remarkably accurate and superior to System B. The final section offers some brief remarks on the power and elegance of the mathematical treatment of the problem by the author of System A.
...MoreDescription Continuation of JournalArticle; John P. Britton; Studies in Babylonian Lunar... (2007) [771461].
Article Britton, John P. (2007) Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part I. Empirical Elements for Modeling Lunar and Solar Anomalies. Archive for History of Exact Sciences (p. 83).
Article Britton, John P. (2010) Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part III. The Introduction of the Uniform Zodiac. Archive for History of Exact Sciences (p. 617).
Similar Citations
Article
Steele, J. M.;
(2007)
Celestial Measurement in Babylonian Astronomy
(/isis/citation/CBB000772410/)
Article
Stern, Sacha;
(2008)
The Babylonian Month and the New Moon: Sighting and Prediction
(/isis/citation/CBB000930117/)
Article
Britton, John P.;
(2010)
Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part III. The Introduction of the Uniform Zodiac
(/isis/citation/CBB001022009/)
Article
Huber, Peter J.;
(2000)
Babylonian Short-Time Measurements: Lunar Sixes
(/isis/citation/CBB000111267/)
Essay Review
Steele, John M.;
(2000)
Babylonian Lunar Theory Reconsidered
(/isis/citation/CBB000110326/)
Article
Brack-Bernsen, Lis;
Hunger, Hermann;
(2008)
BM 42282+42294 and the Goal-Year Method
(/isis/citation/CBB000931524/)
Article
Brack-Bernsen, Lis;
Hunger, Hermann;
(2002)
TU 11: A Collection of Rules for the Prediction of Lunar Phases and of Month Lengths
(/isis/citation/CBB000202124/)
Article
Huber, Peter J.;
Steele, John M.;
(2007)
Babylonian Lunar Six Tablets
(/isis/citation/CBB000773657/)
Article
Britton, John P.;
(2007)
Studies in Babylonian Lunar Theory: Part I. Empirical Elements for Modeling Lunar and Solar Anomalies
(/isis/citation/CBB000771461/)
Essay Review
Van Brummelen, Glen;
(2013)
[Essay review]
(/isis/citation/CBB001566547/)
Article
Duke, Dennis;
(2010)
Greek Angles from Babylonian Numbers
(/isis/citation/CBB001022001/)
Article
Kolev, Rumen;
(2001)
Witnessing the Heliacal Rise of Sirius and Procyon; Babylonian Horoscope MLC 1870
(/isis/citation/CBB000102735/)
Article
Britton, John P.;
(2001)
Remarks on a System A Text for Venus: ACT 1050
(/isis/citation/CBB000101287/)
Article
Jia, Xiao-yong;
Wang, Peng-yun;
(2007)
The Algorithm for Syzygy in the Seleucid Period of Ancient Babylon
(/isis/citation/CBB000760567/)
Article
Mercier, Raymond;
(2007)
The Standard Scheme of the Moon and Its Mean Quantities
(/isis/citation/CBB000771560/)
Book
Swerdlow, N. M.;
(2000)
Ancient Astronomy and Celestial Divination
(/isis/citation/CBB000110580/)
Book
Montelle, Clemency;
(2010)
Chasing Shadows: Mathematics, Astronomy, and the Early History of Eclipse Reckoning
(/isis/citation/CBB001031330/)
Book
Hunger, Hermann;
Pingree, David;
(1999)
Astral Sciences in Mesopotamia. (Handbook of Oriental Studies; The Near and Middle East)
(/isis/citation/CBB000111268/)
Article
Yuste, Piedad;
(2008)
Ecuaciones cuadráticas y procedimientos algorítmicos. Diofanto y las matemáticas en Mesopotamia
(/isis/citation/CBB000933627/)
Article
Yuste, Piedad;
(2005)
Algebra and Geometry in the Old Babylonian Period: Matters Concerning Reeds
(/isis/citation/CBB000651419/)
Be the first to comment!