Article ID: CBB000931566

Different Methods and Metaphysics in Early Molecular Genetics -- A Case of Disparity of Research? (2008)

unapi

Abstract -- The encounter between two fundamentally different approaches in seminal research in molecular biology -- the problems, aims, methods and metaphysics -- is delineated and analyzed. They are exemplified by the microbiologist Oswald T. Avery who, in line with the reductionist mechanistic metaphysics of Jacques Loeb, attempted to explain basic life phenomena through chemistry; and the theoretical physicist Max Delbrück who, influenced by Bohr's antimechanistic views, preferred to explain these phenomena without chemistry. Avery's and Delbrück's most important studies took place concurrently. Thus analysis of their contrasting approaches lends itself to examination of the Weltanschauungen view concerning the role of fundamental (metaphysical) assumptions in scientific change, that is, the view that empirical research cannot be neutral in regard to the worldviews of the researchers. This study shows that the initial ostensible disparity (non-integratibility) of the two approaches lasted for just a short time. Ironically it was a student of Delbrück's school, James Watson, who (with Crick) proposed a chemical model, the DNA double helix, as a solution to Delbrück's problem. The structure of DNA has not been seriously challenged over the past half century. Moreover, Watson's and Crick's work did not call into question the validity of Delbrück's research, but opened it up to entirely new approaches. The case of Avery and Delbrück demonstrates that after initial obstacles were overcome the different fundamental attitudes and the resulting research practices were capable of integration. Keywords -- Oswald T. Avery; Max Delbrück; complementarity; reductionism; explanatory power; phage genetics; transformation

...More

Description Studies two fundamentally different approaches in molecular biology: Oswald T. Avery's explanation of life processes in reductionistic chemical terms, and Max Delbrück's antimechanistic non-chemical explanation.


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB000931566/

Similar Citations

Book Wenkel, Simone; Deichmann, Ute; (2007)
Max Delbrück and Cologne: An Early Chapter of German Molecular Biology (/isis/citation/CBB000830131/)

Article Freire, Olival, Jr.; Leyla Joaquim; Charbel N. El-Hani; (2015)
Quantum Explorers: Bohr, Jordan, and Delbrück Venturing into Biology (/isis/citation/CBB446852324/)

Chapter Deichmann, Ute; (2008)
Challenging the Protein Dogma of the Gene: Oswald T. Avery, a Revolutionary Conservative (/isis/citation/CBB000960096/)

Book Esha Shah; (2018)
Who Is the Scientist-Subject?: Affective History of the Gene (/isis/citation/CBB881962010/)

Article Sloan, Phillip R.; (2012)
How Was Teleology Eliminated in Early Molecular Biology? (/isis/citation/CBB001221597/)

Article Kathryn Maxson Jones; Rachel A. Ankeny; Robert Cook-Deegan; (2018)
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project (/isis/citation/CBB445174130/)

Article Davies, Paul Sheldon; (2000)
Malfunctions (/isis/citation/CBB000111900/)

Article Ross, Don; Spurrett, David; (2007)
Notions of Cause: Russell's Thesis Revisited (/isis/citation/CBB000831433/)

Article Gabriele Gava; (2019)
C. I. Lewis, Kant, and the Reflective Method of Philosophy (/isis/citation/CBB852089833/)

Article A. E. Walsby; M. J. S. Hodge; (2017)
Schrödinger's code-script: not a genetic cipher but a code of development (/isis/citation/CBB517377623/)

Article McKaughan, Daniel J.; (2005)
The Influence of Niels Bohr on Max Delbrück: Revisiting the Hopes Inspired by “Light and Life” (/isis/citation/CBB000650564/)

Article Yafeng Shan; (2021)
Beyond Mendelism and Biometry (/isis/citation/CBB308136354/)

Article Elkin, Lynne Osman; (2003)
Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix (/isis/citation/CBB000340191/)

Chapter McKaughan, Daniel J.; (2011)
Was Delbrück a Reductionist? (/isis/citation/CBB001221101/)

Chapter Roll-Hansen, Nils; (2011)
Niels Bohr and Max Delbrück: Balancing Autonomy and Reductionism in Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001221100/)

Book Zimmer, Karl Günter; Delbrück, Max; Timofeev-Resovskii, N. V.; Sloan, Phillip R.; Fogel, D. Brandon; (2011)
Creating a Physical Biology: The Three-Man Paper and Early Molecular Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001221095/)

Authors & Contributors
Sloan, Phillip R.
McKaughan, Daniel J.
Deichmann, Ute
Walsby, A. E.
Yafeng Shan
Leyla Joaquim
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Physics Today
Physics in Perspective
Journal of the History of Biology
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
Publishers
Routledge India
World Scientific
University of Chicago Press
Concepts
Molecular biology
Genetics
Reductionism
DNA; RNA
Physics
Biology
People
Delbrück, Max
Bohr, Niels Henrik David
Avery, Oswald Theodore
Schrödinger, Erwin
Kant, Immanuel
Jordan, Pascual
Time Periods
20th century, early
20th century
20th century, late
Places
England
Germany
Australia
Institutions
Wellcome Trust
National Institutes of Health
Cambridge. University. Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Universität zu Köln. Institut für Genetik
Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research
Human Genome Project
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment