This paper analyzes the remarkable popularity of William Paley's argument from design among contemporary naturalists in biology and the philosophy of science. In philosophy of science Elliott Sober has argued that creationism should be excluded from the schools not because it is not science but because it is `less likely' than evolution according to fairly standard confirmation theory. Creationism is said to have been a plausible scientific option as presented by Paley but no longer to be acceptable according to the same standards that once approved it. In biology C. G. Williams and Richard Dawkins have seen in Paley a proto-adaptationist. This paper shows that the historical assumptions of Sober's arguments are wrong and that the philosophical arguments themselves take alternatives to science to be alternatives in science and conflate the null hypothesis, chance, with a competing explanatory hypothesis. It is also shown that the similarity of Paley's adaptationism to that of contemporary biology is not what it is made out to be.
...MoreDescription Philosophical study of Paley's views, arguing that some current philosophers and scientists have misanalyzed his ideas.
Similar Citations
Book
Paley, William;
Eddy, Matthew;
Knight, David M.;
(2006)
Natural Theology: Or, Evidence of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB001022579/)
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB392966411/)
Article
Depew, David J.;
(2008)
Consequence Etiology and Biological Teleology in Aristotle and Darwin
(/isis/citation/CBB000831719/)
Article
Tim Lewens;
(2019)
Neo-Paleyan biology
(/isis/citation/CBB833496691/)
Article
Sanz, Vicente Claramonte;
(2013)
La evolución del creacionismo: del mito cosmogónico a la pseudociencia biológica
(/isis/citation/CBB001214017/)
Article
Michael Ruse;
(2016)
Evolutionary biology and the question of teleology
(/isis/citation/CBB878894989/)
Article
Daniel W. McShea;
(2016)
Freedom and purpose in biology
(/isis/citation/CBB213780539/)
Article
Ghiselin, Michael T.;
(2002)
Teleology: Grounds for Avoiding Both the Word and the Thing
(/isis/citation/CBB000501226/)
Article
Bylica, P.;
(2008)
Darwin's Idea of the Purposefulness in Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB000931676/)
Article
Walsh, D. M.;
(2000)
Chasing Shadows: Natural Selection and Adaptation
(/isis/citation/CBB000770649/)
Article
Huneman, Philippe;
(2006)
Naturalising Purpose: From Comparative Anatomy to the “Adventure of Reason”
(/isis/citation/CBB000770746/)
Article
Kahm, Nicholas;
(2013)
Divine Providence in Aquinas's Commentaries on Aristotle's Physics and Metaphysics, and Its Relevance to the Question of Evolution and Creation
(/isis/citation/CBB001201751/)
Book
Barr, Stephen M.;
(2003)
Modern Physics and Ancient Faith
(/isis/citation/CBB000301939/)
Article
Thorvaldsen, Steinar;
Øhrstrøm, Peter;
(2013)
Darwin's Perplexing Paradox: Intelligent Design in Nature
(/isis/citation/CBB001201341/)
Chapter
Topham, Jonathan R.;
(2010)
Biology in the Service of Natural Theology: Paley, Darwin, and the Bridgewater Treatises
(/isis/citation/CBB001020058/)
Article
Gillespie, Neal C.;
(1990)
Divine design and the Industrial Revolution: William Paley's abortive reform of natural theology
(/isis/citation/CBB000034461/)
Article
Armin W. Schulz;
(2016)
Altruism, egoism, or neither: A cognitive-efficiency-based evolutionary biological perspective on helping behavior
(/isis/citation/CBB460292144/)
Article
Cédric Paternotte;
(2020)
Social evolution and the individual-as-maximising-agent analogy
(/isis/citation/CBB692281691/)
Article
Pierrick Bourrat;
(2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem
(/isis/citation/CBB530242611/)
Book
Ruse, Michael;
Travis, Joseph;
(2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years
(/isis/citation/CBB001232307/)
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Kwartalnik Historii Nauki i Techniki
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Be the first to comment!