Vreese, Leen De (Author)
In 1747, James Lind carried out an experiment which proved the usefulness of citrus fruit as a cure for scurvy. Nonetheless, he rejected the earlier hypothesis of Bachstrom that the absence of fresh fruit and vegetables was the only cause of the disease. I explain why it was rational for James Lind not to accept Bachstrom's explanation. I argue that it was the urge for scientific understanding that guided Lind in his rejection and in the development of his alternative theory that humidity was the primary cause of the disease. Central in this process was the search for causal mechanisms which could provide understanding of how the disease developed and which fitted in with the knowledge of the time. Given that the relevant background knowledge and statistical methods were not yet available to Lind, he was right to prefer his own explanation to that of Bachstrom. Although his explanation turned out to be wrong, and Bachstrom's right, from a historical point of view it offered deeper causal understanding of both the development of the disease and the preventive and curative effects of fresh vegetable food. This case study illustrates how the search for causal mechanisms can not only be enlightening, but also very misleading.
...MoreDescription On James Lind's interpretation of his 1747 experiment proving that citrus fruit could cure scurvy, and his rejection of an earlier hypothesis of Bachstrom.
Book
Pierre-Alain Braillard;
Christophe Malaterre;
(2015)
Explanation in Biology: An Enquiry into the Diversity of Explanatory Patterns in the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB328513685/)
Article
Pilpel, Avital;
(2007)
Statistics Is Not Enough: Revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's Critique (1936) of Mendel's Experimental Results (1866)
(/isis/citation/CBB000830396/)
Article
Harrison, Mark;
(2013)
Scurvy on Sea and Land: Political Economy and Natural History, c. 1780--c. 1850
(/isis/citation/CBB001200826/)
Article
Schandeler, Jean-Pierre;
(2012)
La Langue des Sciences Sociales dans le Tableau historique de Condorcet
(/isis/citation/CBB001252123/)
Article
Boantza, Victor D.;
(2007)
Collecting Airs and Ideas: Priestley's Style of Experimental Reasoning
(/isis/citation/CBB000701059/)
Chapter
Thurs, Daniel P.;
(2011)
Scientific Methods
(/isis/citation/CBB001231986/)
Book
Magnani, Lorenzo;
Nersessian, Nancy J.;
(2002)
Model Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values
(/isis/citation/CBB000201255/)
Article
Hsueh Qu;
(2016)
Prescription, Description, and Hume's Experimental Method
(/isis/citation/CBB423983702/)
Article
van den Berg, Hein;
(2011)
Kant's Conception of Proper Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001211471/)
Article
Magnus, P. D.;
(2010)
Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001230043/)
Chapter
Carpenter, Kenneth J.;
(2002)
Prematurity and Delay in the Prevention of Scurvy
(/isis/citation/CBB000202419/)
Thesis
Ashley, Raymond Edward;
(2001)
Longitude and Scurvy: The Mechanics of Problem Solving in the Age of Sail
(/isis/citation/CBB001560585/)
Book
Wrigley, Richard;
Revill, George;
(2000)
Pathologies of Travel
(/isis/citation/CBB000110604/)
Article
David Teira;
(2019)
Placebo trials without mechanisms: How far can they go?
(/isis/citation/CBB058338660/)
Chapter
Arabatzis, Theodore;
(2012)
Hidden Entities and Experimental Practice: Renewing the Dialogue Between History and Philosophy of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001500247/)
Chapter
Daston, Lorraine;
(2010)
The Empire of Observation, 1600--1800
(/isis/citation/CBB001221449/)
Article
Olaf L. Mueller;
(2016)
Prismatic Equivalence – A New Case of Underdetermination: Goethe vs. Newton on the Prism Experiments
(/isis/citation/CBB847582954/)
Article
Pier Remigio Salvi;
(2021)
Discovering Oxygen: Experimental Techniques and Logic of a Great Chemist, Carl Wilhelm Scheele
(/isis/citation/CBB414666961/)
Article
Stahnisch, Frank W.;
(2005)
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on Experimental Practice in Medicine and the Life Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001033068/)
Article
Tripodi, Paolo;
(2014)
Conceptual Mediation: Philosophy between the History of Physiology and Contemporary Neuroscience
(/isis/citation/CBB001201194/)
Be the first to comment!