Article ID: CBB000830396

Statistics Is Not Enough: Revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's Critique (1936) of Mendel's Experimental Results (1866) (2007)

unapi

This paper is concerned with the role of rational belief change theory in the philosophical understanding of experimental error. Today, philosophers seek insight about error in the investigation of specific experiments, rather than in general theories. Nevertheless, rational belief change theory adds to our understanding of just such cases: R. A. Fisher's criticism of Mendel's experiments being a case in point. After an historical introduction, the main part of this paper investigates Fisher's paper from the point of view of rational belief change theory: what changes of belief about Mendel's experiment does Fisher go through and with what justification. It leads to surprising insights about what Fisher had done right and wrong, and, more generally, about the limits of statistical methods in detecting error.

...More

Description “This paper is concerned with the role of rational belief change theory in the philosophical understanding of experimental error [and especially] about the limits of statistical methods in detecting error.” (from the abstract)


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB000830396/

Similar Citations

Thesis Hall, Nancy Louise Schafer; (2002)
R. A. Fisher and Randomized Experimental Design (/isis/citation/CBB001562294/)

Chapter Hon, Giora; (2009)
Error: The Long Neglect, the One-Sided View, and a Typology (/isis/citation/CBB001020625/)

Article Hall, Nancy S.; (2007)
R. A. Fisher and His Advocacy of Randomization (/isis/citation/CBB000772594/)

Article Patton, Lydia; (2011)
Reconsidering Experiments (/isis/citation/CBB001230105/)

Chapter Schickore, Jutta; (2012)
Scientists' Methods Accounts: S. Weir Mitchell's Research on the Venom of Poisonous Snakes (/isis/citation/CBB001500248/)

Chapter Shickore, Jutta; (2009)
Error as Historiographical Challenge: The Infamous Globule Hypothesis (/isis/citation/CBB001020626/)

Chapter Steinle, Friedrich; (2009)
How Experiments Make Concepts Fail: Faraday and Magnetic Curves (/isis/citation/CBB001020629/)

Article López-Beltrán, Carlos; (2006)
Storytelling, Statistics and Hereditary Thought: The Narrative Support of Early Statistics (/isis/citation/CBB000770715/)

Article Kampourakis, Kostas; (2013)
Mendel and the Path to Genetics: Portraying Science as a Social Process (/isis/citation/CBB001252323/)

Book James Elwick; (2007)
Styles of Reasoning in the British Life Sciences: Shared Assumptions, 1820–1858 (/isis/citation/CBB879149810/)

Article Bond, Niall; (2013)
Ferdinand Tönnies and Enlightenment: A Friend or Foe of Reason? (/isis/citation/CBB001201146/)

Book Zabell, S. L.; (2005)
Symmetry and Its Discontents: Essays on the History of Inductive Probability (/isis/citation/CBB000770199/)

Article Cobb, Aaron D.; (2012)
Inductivism in Practice: Experiment in John Herschel's Philosophy of Science (/isis/citation/CBB001232109/)

Authors & Contributors
Wynn, James
Schickore, Jutta
Cobb, Aaron D.
Mayo, Lee Allen
Zabell, Sandy L.
Vreese, Leen De
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Philosophy of Science
HOPOS
Science and Education
Journal of the History of Biology
European Legacy
Publishers
University of Maryland, College Park
University of Pittsburgh Press
University of Notre Dame
Cambridge University Press
Concepts
Methodology of science; scientific method
Experiments and experimentation
Philosophy of science
Probability and statistics
Heredity
Physics
People
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer
Mendel, Gregor Johann
Galton, Francis
Faraday, Michael
Darwin, Charles Robert
Vries, Hugo Marie de
Time Periods
19th century
20th century, early
18th century
Enlightenment
21st century
20th century, late
Places
Germany
France
Europe
Great Britain
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment