Kingsland, Sharon E. (Author)
A rereading of the American scientific literature on sex determination from 1902 to 1926 leads to a different understanding of the construction of the Mendelian-chromosome theory after 1910. There was significant intellectual continuity, which has not been properly appreciated, underlying this scientific revolution. After reexamining the relationship between the ideas of key scientists, in particular Edmund B. Wilson and Thomas Hunt Morgan, I argue that, contrary to the historical literature, Wilson and Morgan did not adopt opposing views on Mendelism and sex determination. Rather, each preferred a non-Mendelian explanation of the determination of sex. Around 1910, both integrated the Mendelian and non-Mendelian theories to create a synthetic theory. One problem was the need to avoid an overly deterministic view of sex while also accepting the validity of Mendelism. Morgan's discovery of mutations on the X chromosome takes on different significance when set in the context of the debate about sex determination, and Calvin Bridges's work on sex determination is better seen as a development of Morgan's ideas, rather than a departure from them. Conclusions point to the role of synthesis within fields as a way to advance scientific theories and reflect on the relationship between synthesis and explanatory pluralism in biology.
...More
Article
deJong-Lambert, William;
Krementsov, Nikolai;
(2012)
On Labels and Issues: The Lysenko Controversy and the Cold War
Article
Pereira Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr;
(2012)
Um representante do estilo de pensamento científico “compreensivo,” William Bateson (1861--1926): ciência, política e arte
Article
Schuller, Kyla;
(2012)
Taxonomies of Feeling: The Epistemology of Sentimentalism in Late-Nineteenth-Century Racial and Sexual Science
Book
Maienschein, Jane;
(1991)
Transforming traditions in American biology, 1880-1915
Article
(1987)
The role of Johns Hopkins University in the development of experimental and quantitative biology in America
Article
Volpone, Alessandro;
(2018)
Paolo Della Valle ed Edmund B. Wilson sulla natura dei cromosomi: Concezioni a confronto
Article
David Ceccarelli;
(2021)
“The bad habit of wandering”: Morgan, Osborn and the issue of evolutionary causality in genetics and paleontology
Chapter
Gissis, Snait B.;
Jablonka, Eva;
(2011)
The Exclusion of Soft (“Lamarckian”) Inheritance from the Modern Synthesis
Book
Amir Teicher;
(2019)
Social Mendelism: Genetics and the Politics of Race in Germany, 1900-1948
Article
Ankeny, Rachel A.;
(2000)
Marvelling at the Marvel: The Supposed Conversion of A. D. Darbishire to Mendelism
Article
Radick, Gregory;
(2011)
Physics in the Galtonian Sciences of Heredity
Article
Giulia Frezza;
Mauro Capocci;
(2018)
Thomas Hunt Morgan and the Invisible Gene: The Right Tool for the Job
Article
Schochow, Maximilian;
(2010)
In den Leib geschnitten. Produktionsformen des biologischen Geschlechts
Thesis
Jeffrey W. Lockhart;
(2022)
Establishing Sex: The Scientific Quest to Support a Controversial Binary
Article
Cottebrune, Anne;
(2009)
Zwischen Theorie und Deutung der Vererbung psychischer Störungen. Zur Übertragung des Mendelismus auf die Psychiatrie in Deutschland und in den USA, 1911--1930
Article
Cottebrune, Anne;
(2008)
Zwischen Theorie und Deutung der Vererbung psychischer Störungen: Zur Übertragung des Mendelismus auf die Psychiatrie in Deutschland und in den USA, 1911--1930
Article
Garland E. Allen;
(2017)
Mendelism and the Promise of A New Agriculture, 1900-1945
Article
Ha, Nathan Q.;
(2011)
The Riddle of Sex: Biological Theories of Sexual Difference in the Early Twentieth-Century
Article
Esposito, Maurizio;
(2013)
Weismann Versus Morgan Revisited: Clashing Interpretations on Animal Regeneration
Book
Muzrukova, E. B.;
(2002)
T. Kh. Morgan i genetika. Nauchnaia programma shkoly T. Kh. Morgana v kontekste razvitiia biologii XX stoletiia
Be the first to comment!