Article ID: CBB000772595

Panpsychic Organicism: Sewall Wright's Philosophy for Understanding Complex Genetic Systems (2007)

unapi

Sewall Wright first encountered the complex systems characteristic of gene combinations while a graduate student at Harvard's Bussey Institute from 1912 to 1915. In Mendelian breeding experiments, Wright observed a hierarchical dependence of the organism's phenotype on dynamic networks of genetic interaction and organization. An animal's physical traits, and thus its autonomy from surrounding environmental constraints, depended greatly on how genes behaved in certain combinations. Wright recognized that while genes are the material determinants of the animal phenotype, operating with great regularity, the special nature of genetic systems contributes to the animal phenotype a degree of spontaneity and novelty, creating unpredictable trait variations by virtue of gene interactions. As a result of his experimentation, as well as his keen interest in the philosophical literature of his day, Wright was inspired to see genetic systems as conscious, living organisms in their own right. Moreover, he decided that since genetic systems maintain ordered stability and cause unpredictable novelty in their organic wholes (the animal phenotype), it would be necessary for biologists to integrate techniques for studying causally ordered phenomena (experimental method) and chance phenomena (correlation method). From 1914 to 1921 Wright developed his method of path coefficient (or path analysis), a new procedure drawing from both laboratory experimentation and statistical correlation in order to analyze the relative influence of specific genetic interactions on phenotype variation. In this paper I aim to show how Wright's philosophy for understanding complex genetic systems (panpsychic organicism) logically motivated his 1914--1921 design of path analysis.

...More

Description “In this paper I aim to show how Wright's philosophy for understanding complex genetic systems (panpsychic organicism) logically motivated his 1914--1921 design of path analysis.” (from the abstract)


Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB000772595/

Similar Citations

Article Mikhail B. Konashev; (2023)
The Russian Backdrop to Dobzhansky’s Genetics and the Origin of Species

Book Brush, Stephen G.; (2009)
Choosing Selection: The Revival of Natural Selection in Anglo-American Evolutionary Biology, 1930--1970

Thesis Plutynski, Anya James; (2002)
Modeling Evolution

Thesis Peterson, Erik L.; (cited 2011)
Finding Mind, Form, Organism, and Person in a Reductionist Age: The Challenge of Gregory Bateson and C. H. Waddington to Biological and Anthropological Orthodoxy, 1924--1980

Book Rasini, Vallori; (2002)
Teorie della realtà organica: Helmuth Plessner e Viktor von Weizsäcker

Article Hodge, Jonathan; (2011)
Darwinism after Mendelism: The Case of Sewall Wright's Intellectual Synthesis in His Shifting Balance Theory of Evolution (1931)

Chapter Skipper, Robert A., Jr.; (2009)
Revisiting the Fisher-Wright Controversy

Article Gerrits, Lasse; Marks, Peter; (2015)
The Evolution of Wright's (1932) Adaptive Field to Contemporary Interpretations and Uses of Fitness Landscapes in the Social Sciences

Article Collins, James P.; (2015)
Commentary: Tempo of Evolutionary Change in Ecological Systems

Article Rudge, David Wÿss; (2000)
The Complementary Roles of Observation and Experiment: Theodosius Dobzhansky's Genetics of Natural Populations IX and XII

Article Suárez, Edna; (2001)
Satellite-DNA: A case-study for the evolution of experimental techniques

Article Tuunainen, Juha; (2001)
Constructing Objects and Transforming Experimental Systems

Article Allen, Garland E.; (2005)
Mechanism, Vitalism and Organicism in Late Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Biology: The Importance of Historical Context

Thesis Wan, Vincent; (2012)
Historical Causes and Map Visualizations in Biology

Article Jean-Baptiste Grodwohl; (2017)
“The Theory was Beautiful Indeed”: Rise, Fall and Circulation of Maximizing Methods in Population Genetics (1930–1980)

Article Radick, Gregory; (2013)
The Professor and the Pea: Lives and Afterlives of William Bateson's Campaign for the Utility of Mendelism

Article Roll-Hansen, Nils; (2009)
Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen's Genotype Theory

Article Svit Komel; (2023)
Technology in scientific practice: How H. J. Muller used the fruit fly to investigate the X-ray machine

Article Anahita Rouyan; (2019)
1927–1939: American science writers shape public approaches toward genetic modification in response to Hermann J. Muller’s fruit fly experiments

Article Peterson, Erik L.; (2011)
The Excluded Philosophy of Evo-Devo? Revisiting C.H. Waddington's Failed Attempt to Embed Alfred North Whitehead's “Organicism” in Evolutionary Biology

Authors & Contributors
Peterson, Erik L.
Allen, Garland E.
Brush, Stephen G.
Collins, James P.
Hodge, Jonathan
Konashev, Mikhail B.
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Journal of the History of Biology
Biology and Philosophy
Perspectives on Science
Public Understanding of Science
Publishers
American Philosophical Society
University of Chicago
University of Pennsylvania
Sigem
University of Notre Dame
Concepts
Evolution
Genetics
Experiments and experimentation
Biology
Organicism
Darwinism
People
Wright, Sewall
Dobzhansky, Theodosius
Fisher, Ronald Aylmer
Waddington, Conrad Hal
Bateson, Gregory
Bateson, William
Time Periods
20th century, early
20th century
20th century, late
19th century
Places
Great Britain
United States
Finland
Russia
Institutions
Helsingin yliopisto (Finland)
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment