I offer a reply to criticisms of the Strong Programme presented by Stephen Kemp who develops some new lines of argument that focus on the `monism' of the programme. He says the programme should be rejected for three reasons. First, because it embodies `weak idealism', that is, its supporters effectively sever the link between language and the world. Second, it challenges the reasons that scientists offer in explanation of their own beliefs. Third, it destroys the distinction between successful and unsuccessful instrumental action. Kemp is careful to produce quotations from the supporters of the programme as evidence to support his case. All three points deserve and are given a detailed response and the interpretation of the quoted material plays a significant role in the discussion. My hope is that careful exegesis will offset the numerous misinterpretations that are current in the philosophical literature. Particular attention is paid to what is said about the normative standards involved in the application of empirical concepts. The operation of these standards in the face of the negotiability of all concepts is explored and misapprehensions on the topic are corrected. The work of Wittgenstein, Popper, Kuhn and Hesse is used to illustrate these themes.
...MoreDescription Reply to a 2005 article by Stephen Kemp. See also:
Article Kemp, Stephen (2007) Concepts, Anomalies and Reality: A Response to Bloor and Fehér. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (p. 241).
Article Fehér, Márta (2007) Saving the Strong Programme: A Critique of Stephen Kemp's Recent Paper. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (p. 235).
Article
Tosh, Nick;
(2006)
Science, Truth and History, Part I. Historiography, Relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000740023/)
Book
Hannah Star Rogers;
(2022)
Art, Science, and the Politics of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB734293422/)
Article
Lander, Bryn;
(2011)
Between Theory and Craft: Exploring the Role of Co-operation within Scientific Research Labs
(/isis/citation/CBB001220697/)
Article
Kusch, Martin;
(2004)
Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch Debate Revisited
(/isis/citation/CBB000651372/)
Book
Fuller, Steve;
(2006)
The Philosophy of Science and Technology Studies
(/isis/citation/CBB000600211/)
Article
Akera, Atsushi;
(2007)
Constructing a Representation for an Ecology of Knowledge: Methodological Advances in the Integration of Knowledge and Its Various Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB000780234/)
Book
Vinck, Dominique;
(2010)
Sociology of Scientific Work: The Fundamental Relationship between Science and Society
(/isis/citation/CBB001020915/)
Article
Pinch, Trevor;
(2010)
The Invisible Technologies of Goffman's Sociology from the Merry-Go-Round to the Internet
(/isis/citation/CBB000954240/)
Article
Wang, Yan-yu;
Zhang, Xiang;
(2007)
On the SSK Challenge to Merton's Ethos of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000760562/)
Article
Sophia Efstathiou;
(2016)
Is it possible to give scientific solutions to Grand Challenges? On the idea of grand challenges for life science research
(/isis/citation/CBB489482782/)
Book
Weinberg, Steven;
(2001)
Facing Up: Science and Its Cultural Adversaries
(/isis/citation/CBB000500879/)
Thesis
Xu, Jun;
(2012)
Where Knowledge Thrives: The Role of the Metaphorical in Scientific Process
(/isis/citation/CBB001567356/)
Article
Rik Wehrens;
(2019)
Experimentation in the sociology of science: Representational and generative registers in the imitation game
(/isis/citation/CBB134994307/)
Article
Rik Wehrens;
(2019)
The Imitation Game: Response to Collins and Evans
(/isis/citation/CBB537560685/)
Book
Latour, Bruno;
(2010)
On the Cult of the Factish Gods
(/isis/citation/CBB001023108/)
Book
Carrier, Martin;
(2004)
Knowledge and the World: Challenges Beyond the Science Wars
(/isis/citation/CBB000470707/)
Article
Tosh, Nick;
(2007)
Science, Truth and History, Part II. Metaphysical Bolt-Holes for the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge?
(/isis/citation/CBB000771907/)
Article
Gulbrandsen, Magnus;
Langfeldt, Liv;
(2004)
In Search of “Mode 2”: The Nature of Knowledge Production in Norway
(/isis/citation/CBB000700970/)
Book
Raynaud, Dominique;
(2003)
Sociologie des controverses scientifiques
(/isis/citation/CBB000954375/)
Article
Kitcher, Philip;
(2002)
The Third Way: Reflections on Helen Longino's The Fate of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000410803/)
Be the first to comment!