IsisCB Explore

Article ID: CBB000771310

Styles of Reasoning in Early to Mid-Victorian Life Research: Analysis:Synthesis and Palaetiology (2007)

Elwick, James M. (Author)

Journal of the History of Biology
Volume: 40
Pages: 35--69

Outside Links

WorldCat

Google Scholar

JSTOR

Academia.edu

Biology Developmental biology Reasoning in science 19th century Carpenter, William Benjamin Owen, Richard Huxley, Thomas Henry

To better understand the work of pre-Darwinian British life researchers in their own right, this paper discusses two different styles of reasoning. On the one hand there was analysis:synthesis, where an organism was disintegrated into its constituent parts and then reintegrated into a whole; on the other hand there was palaetiology, the historicist depiction of the progressive specialization of an organism. This paper shows how each style allowed for development, but showed it as moving in opposite directions. In analysis:synthesis, development proceeded centripetally, through the fusion of parts. Meanwhile in palaetiology, development moved centrifugally, through the ramifying specialization of an initially simple substance. I first examine a community of analytically oriented British life researchers, exemplified by Richard Owen, and certain technical questions they considered important. These involved the neurosciences, embryology, and reproduction and regeneration. The paper then looks at a new generation of British palaetiologists, exemplified by W.B. Carpenter and T.H. Huxley, who succeeded at portraying analysts' questions as irrelevant. The link between styles of reasoning and physical sites is also explored. Analysts favored museums, which facilitated the examination and display of unchanging marine organisms while providing a power base for analysts. I suggest that palaetiologists were helped by vivaria, which included marine aquaria and Wardian cases. As they became popular in the early 1850s, vivaria provided palaetiologists with a different kind of living and changing evidence. Forms of evidence, how they were preserved and examined, and career options all reinforced each other: social and epistemic factors thus merged.

...More

Description Comparison of reasoning styles in developmental biology---“analysis: synthesis” exemplified by Richard Owen and “palaetiology” exemplified by W. B. Carpenter and T. H. Huxley.

Citation URI

http://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB000771310/

Citations Indexes

Similar Citations

Book Cosans, Christopher E.; (2009)
Owen's Ape and Darwin's Bulldog: Beyond Darwinism and Creationism (/isis/citation/CBB000951052/)

Article Ospovat, Dov; (1976)
The influence of Karl Ernst von Baer's embryology, 1828-1859: A reappraisal in light of Richard Owen's and William B. Carpenter's “Palaeontological application of `Von Baer's Law'.” (/isis/citation/CBB000011880/)

Article Stiles, Anne; (2006)
Cerebral Automatism, the Brain, and the Soul in Bram Stoker's Dracula (/isis/citation/CBB000610293/)

Article Cosans, Christopher; (1994)
Anatomy, metaphysics, and values: The ape brain debate reconsidered (/isis/citation/CBB000030732/)

Article Gross, Charles G.; (1993)
Hippocampus minor and man's place in nature: A case study in the social construction of neuroanatomy (/isis/citation/CBB000054193/)

Article Gould, Stephen Jay; (1986)
The Archaeopteryx flap (/isis/citation/CBB000059278/)

Article Smith, C.U.M.; Smith, C. U. M.; (1998)
Owen and Huxley: Unfinished business (/isis/citation/CBB000076960/)

Article Wilson, Leonard G.; (1996)
The gorilla and the question of human origins: The brain controversy (/isis/citation/CBB000070383/)

Article Smith, C.U.M.; Smith, C. U. M.; (1997)
Worlds in collision: Owen and Huxley on the brain (/isis/citation/CBB000077733/)

Chapter Dawson, Gowan; (2014)
“The Great O. Versus the Jermyn St. Pet”: Huxley, Falconer, and Owen on Paleontological Method (/isis/citation/CBB001422045/)

Book Rupke, Nicolaas A.; (2009)
Richard Owen: Biology without Darwin (/isis/citation/CBB001020063/)

Book Cadbury, Deborah; (2000)
The Dinosaur Hunters: A True Story of Scientific Rivalry and the Discovery of the Prehistoric World (/isis/citation/CBB000102649/)

Article Ingo Brigandt; (2009)
Accounting for Vertebrate Limbs: From Owen's Homology to Novelty in Evo-Devo (/isis/citation/CBB374671633/)

Article Curtis N. Johnson; (2019)
Charles Darwin, Richard Owen, and Natural Selection: A Question of Priority (/isis/citation/CBB684893999/)

Article Hopwood, Nick; (2005)
Visual Standards and Disciplinary Change: Normal Plates, Tables and Stages in Embryology (/isis/citation/CBB000773901/)

Article Camardi, Giovanni; (2001)
Richard Owen, Morphology and Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB000100503/)

Article Wellmann, Janina; (2008)
Die Metamorphose der Bilder: Die Verwandlung der Insekten und ihre Darstellung vom Ende des 17. bis zum Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts (/isis/citation/CBB000930727/)

Article James W. E. Lowe; (2016)
Normal development and experimental embryology: Edmund Beecher Wilson and Amphioxus (/isis/citation/CBB114945953/)

Thesis Brigandt, Ingo; (2006)
A Theory of Conceptual Advance: Explaining Conceptual Change in Evolutionary, Molecular, and Evolutionary Developmental Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001560506/)

Article Sloan, Phillip R.; (2003)
Whewell's Philosophy of Discovery and the Archetype of the Vertebrate Skeleton: The Role of German Philosophy of Science in Richard Owen's Biology (/isis/citation/CBB000330662/)