Ratcliffe, Matthew (Author)
Contemporary analyses of biological function almost invariably advocate a naturalistic analysis, grounding biological functions in some feature of the mind-independent world. Many recent accounts suggest that no single analysis will be appropriate for all cases of use and that biological teleology should be split into several distinct categories. This paper argues that such accounts have paid too little attention to the way in which functional language is used, concentrating instead on the types of situation in which it is used. An example of the role of teleology in science is examined and, on the basis of conclusions drawn from this, an alternative unifying analysis is proposed. It is suggested that, contrary to naturalistic accounts, teleology in biology carries no ontological commitment whatsoever to any class of mind-independent entities or properties. Instead, it is best regarded as a methodological device which is used to focus interest, formulate research perspectives and facilitate the structuring of certain questions or types of question that are pertinent in a given context of interest.
...MoreArticle Lipton, Peter (2000) Introduction: The Pull of Teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (p. 1).
Article
Sandy C. Boucher;
(2021)
Biological Teleology, Reductionism, and Verbal Disputes
(/isis/citation/CBB536738665/)
Article
Aaron Wells;
(2020)
Kant, Linnaeus, and the economy of nature
(/isis/citation/CBB872058525/)
Article
Maund, Barry;
(2000)
Proper Functions and Aristotelian Functions in Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000770650/)
Article
Philippe Huneman;
(2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation
(/isis/citation/CBB392966411/)
Essay Review
Schlosser, Gerhard;
(2003)
Naturalizing Functions: Unity beyond Pluralism?
(/isis/citation/CBB001566903/)
Article
Jonathan Birch;
(2019)
Inclusive fitness as a criterion for improvement
(/isis/citation/CBB535828538/)
Article
Wouters, Arno G.;
(2003)
Four Notions of Biological Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000340829/)
Essay Review
Lewens, Tim;
(2001)
No End to Function Talk in Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000100749/)
Article
Zammito, John;
(2006)
Teleology Then and Now: The Question of Kant's Relevance for Contemporary Controversies over Function in Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB000770751/)
Article
James DiFrisco;
(2017)
Functional explanation and the problem of functional equivalence
(/isis/citation/CBB378954890/)
Book
McLaughlin, Peter;
(2001)
What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems
(/isis/citation/CBB000502485/)
Book
Gayon, Jean;
de Ricqlès, Armand;
(2010)
Les fonctions: des organismes aux artifacts
(/isis/citation/CBB001023153/)
Article
Amundson, Ron;
(2000)
Against Normal Function
(/isis/citation/CBB000770644/)
Article
Karina Alleva;
José Díez;
Lucia Federico;
(2017)
Models, theory structure and mechanisms in biochemistry: The case of allosterism
(/isis/citation/CBB541545262/)
Book
Koons, Robert C.;
(2000)
Realism Regained: An Exact Theory of Causation, Teleology, and the Mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000410586/)
Article
Gambarotto, Andrea;
(2014)
Vital Forces and Organization: Philosophy of Nature and Biology in Karl Friedrich Kielmeyer
(/isis/citation/CBB001421577/)
Article
Short, T. L.;
(2002)
Darwin's Concept of Final Cause: Neither New nor Trivial
(/isis/citation/CBB000202574/)
Article
Ruse, Michael;
(2000)
Teleology: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow?
(/isis/citation/CBB000770653/)
Article
Takacs, Peter;
Ruse, Michael;
(2013)
The Current Status of the Philosophy of Biology
(/isis/citation/CBB001252311/)
Article
Luca Corti;
(2022)
The ‘Is’ and the ‘Ought’ of the Animal Organism: Hegel’s Account of Biological Normativity
(/isis/citation/CBB964888680/)
Be the first to comment!