Common opinion ascribes to Immanuel Kant the view that psychology cannot become a science properly so called, because it cannot be mathematized. It is equally common to claim that this reflects the state of the art of his times; that the quantification of the mind was not achieved during the eighteenth century, while it was so during the nineteenth century; or that Kant's so-called impossibility claim was refuted by nineteenth-century developments, which in turn opened one path for psychology to become properly scientific. These opinions are often connected, but they are misguided nevertheless. In Part I, I show how the issue of a quantification of the mind was discussed before Kant, and I analyze the philosophical considerations both of pessimistic and optimistic authors. This debate reveals a certain progress, although it remains ultimately undecided. In Part II, I present actual examples of measuring the mind in the eighteenth century and analyze their presuppositions. Although these examples are limited in certain ways, the common view that there was no such measurement is wrong. In Part III, I show how Kant's notorious impossibility claim has to be viewed against its historical background. He not only accepts actual examples of a quantitative treatment of the mind, but also takes steps toward an explanation of their possibility. Thus, he does not advance the claim that the mind as such cannot be mathematized. His claim is directed against certain philosophical assumptions about the mind, assumptions shared by a then-dominating, strongly introspectionist conception of psychology. This conception did and could not provide an explanation of the possibility of quantifying the mind. In concluding, I reflect on how this case study helps to improve the dispute over when and why psychology became a science.
...More
Article
Allison, Henry E.;
(1995)
On naturalizing Kant's transcendental psychology
(/isis/citation/CBB000069057/)
Book
Königshausen, Johann-Heinrich;
(1977)
Kants Theorie des Denkens
(/isis/citation/CBB000024710/)
Book
Ameriks, Karl;
(1982)
Kant's theory of mind: An analysis of pure reason
(/isis/citation/CBB000025643/)
Article
Clinton Tolley;
(2020)
Kant on the place of cognition in the progression of our representations
(/isis/citation/CBB063404893/)
Book
Kim, Soo Bae;
(1994)
Die Entstehung der Kantischen Anthropologie und ihre Beziehung zur empirischen Psychologie der Wolffschen Schule
(/isis/citation/CBB000032460/)
Book
Gibbons, Sarah L.;
(1994)
Kant's theory of imagination: Bridging gaps in judgement and experience
(/isis/citation/CBB000047262/)
Article
Paumen, Jean;
(1981)
Kant et le procès de la psychologie rationnelle
(/isis/citation/CBB000012253/)
Article
Falkenstein, Lorne;
(1991)
Kant's account of intuition
(/isis/citation/CBB000048152/)
Article
Jacobs, Wilhelm G.;
(1986)
Leib und Seele: Kants transzendentalphilosophische Kritik an der Position der frühen Neuzeit
(/isis/citation/CBB000052867/)
Article
Zoeller, Guenter;
(1992)
Lichtenberg and Kant on the subject of thinking
(/isis/citation/CBB000056408/)
Article
Frierson, Patrick;
(2009)
Kant on Mental Disorder. Part 1: An Overview
(/isis/citation/CBB000932521/)
Article
Rozenberg, Jacques;
(1985)
La théorie optique de l'hallucination dans les Rêves d'un visionnaire de Kant
(/isis/citation/CBB000039219/)
Chapter
Schott, Robin M.;
(1987)
Kant's treatment of sensibility
(/isis/citation/CBB000049617/)
Article
Naragon, Steve;
(1990)
Kant on Descartes and the brutes
(/isis/citation/CBB000060050/)
Article
Ash, Mitchell;
(2007)
Die Sichtbarmachung des Unsichtbaren. Bemerkungen über Visualisierungsdiskurse und -strategien in der Geschichte der Psychologie
(/isis/citation/CBB001023523/)
Article
Udo Thiel;
(2020)
Priestley and Kant on Materialism
(/isis/citation/CBB616453784/)
Book
Powell, C. Thomas;
(1990)
Kant's theory of self-consciousness
(/isis/citation/CBB000039424/)
Book
Brook, Andrew;
(1994)
Kant and the mind
(/isis/citation/CBB000039075/)
Thesis
Waxman, Wayne A.;
(1987)
Kant's model of the mind
(/isis/citation/CBB001565449/)
Article
Matthew Perkins-McVey;
(2022)
Kant, intoxicated: the aesthetics of drunkenness, between moral duty and “active play”
(/isis/citation/CBB800355901/)
Be the first to comment!