This paper discusses the American scientist and philosopher Charles S. Peirce's (1839--1914) classification of the sciences from the contemporary perspective of interdisciplinary studies. Three theses are defended: (1) Studies on interdisciplinarity pertain to the intermediate class of Peirce's classification of all science, the sciences of review (retrospective science), ranking below the sciences of discovery (heuretic sciences) and above practical science (the arts). (2) Scientific research methods adopted by interdisciplinary inquiries are cross-categorial. Making them converge to an increasing extent with the sciences of discovery, especially the methodeutic of normative logic, is one of the future challenges for studies on interdisciplinarity. (3) The overall structure of Peirce's classification, were it to be applied in today's situation, would not, in any major respect, be radically different from what it was designed to reflect a hundred years ago, in spite of the virtually exponential creation and production of new domains and the massive increase in investment in research and scientific publication. Accordingly, charges that the sciences of discovery are becoming ever more fragmented are not new.
...More
Article
Atkins, Richard Kenneth;
(2006)
Restructuring the Sciences: Peirce's Categories and His Classifications of the Sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001023423/)
Thesis
Kent, Beverly E.;
(1975)
Logic in the context of Peirce's classification of the sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB001563856/)
Article
Pape, Helmut;
(1993)
Final causality in Peirce's semiotics and his classification of the sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB000057410/)
Article
Allen, Colin;
The InPhO Group, ;
(2013)
Cross-Cutting Categorization Schemes in the Digital Humanities
(/isis/citation/CBB001321218/)
Article
Patrick Egan (Pádraig Mac Aodhgáin);
(2021)
Insider or outsider? Exploring some digital challenges in ethnomusicology
(/isis/citation/CBB448654630/)
Article
Alfonso-Goldfarb, Ana M.;
Waisse, Silvia;
Ferraz, Márcia H. M.;
(2013)
From Shelves to Cyberspace: Organization of Knowledge and the Complex Identity of History of Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001321216/)
Chapter
Haaparanta, Leila;
(2009)
The Relations between Logic and Philosophy, 1874--1931
(/isis/citation/CBB001210347/)
Article
Chris Campbell;
(2019)
The Periodic Table as an Icon: A Perspective from the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce
(/isis/citation/CBB857890487/)
Article
Ramhartera, Esther;
Gottschalla, Christian;
(2011)
Peirce's Search for a Graphical Modal Logic (Propositional Part)
(/isis/citation/CBB001210986/)
Article
Enn Kasak;
Raul Veede;
(2016)
Understanding Knowledge through the Example of C. S. Peirce’s Cosmology
(/isis/citation/CBB244622928/)
Book
John J. Stuhr;
(2022)
No Professor's Lectures Can Save Us: William James's Pragmatism, Radical Empiricism, and Pluralism
(/isis/citation/CBB512993699/)
Article
Pihlström, Sami;
(2008)
How (Not) to Write the History of Pragmatist Philosophy of Science?
(/isis/citation/CBB000831774/)
Chapter
Hilpinen, Risto;
(2009)
Conditional and Possible Worlds: On C. S. Pierce's Conception of Conditionals and Modalities
(/isis/citation/CBB001210353/)
Article
Marc Champagne;
(2019)
Diagrams and alien ways of thinking
(/isis/citation/CBB909895920/)
Thesis
David E. Dunning;
(2020)
Writing the Rules of Reason: Notations in Mathematical Logic, 1847–1937
(/isis/citation/CBB517005733/)
Chapter
Maria de Lourdes Bacha;
(2015)
Charles Sanders Peirce and Experimental Science
(/isis/citation/CBB922405276/)
Article
Francesco Bellucci;
(2015)
Logic, Psychology, and Apperception: Charles S. Peirce and Johann F. Herbart
(/isis/citation/CBB115765207/)
Thesis
Willgoose, James Edward;
(2002)
What the Mathematical Poet Must Abide By: Epistemological Aspects of Charles Peirce's Philosophy of Mathematics
(/isis/citation/CBB001562297/)
Thesis
Rossi, Michael Paul;
(2011)
The Rules of Perception: American Color Science, 1831--1931
(/isis/citation/CBB001567292/)
Article
Jeoffrey Gaspard;
(2021)
“A familiar logical triplet”: on Peirce’s grammar of representation and its relation to scientific inquiry
(/isis/citation/CBB856081407/)
Be the first to comment!