Dietrich, Heather (Author)
Schibeci, R. (Author)
Public policy assumptions, which view "the public" as passive consumers, are deeply flawed. "The public" are, in fact, active citizens, who constitute the innovation end of the seamless web of relationships, running from research and development laboratory to shop, hospital or farm, or local neighborhood. "The public" do not receive the impact of technology; they are the impact, in that they determine with gene technology (GT) developers and sellers what happens to the technology in our society. In doing so, they, or more rightly we, exercise particular, contextual knowledges and actions. We suggest that it is the ignorance of this aspect of innovation in policy processes that produces the distrust and resentment that we found in our interviews with "publics" interested in gene technology. This is consistent with Beck's description of the deep structural states of risk and fear in modern advanced societies with respect to new technologies, such as gene technology. Only policy processes that recognize the particular, local, and contextual knowledges of "the public," which co-construct innovation, can achieve deep, social structural consideration of gene technology. And only such a deep consideration can avoid the polarized attitudes and deep suspicions that we have seen arise in places such as Britain. Such consideration needs the type of processes that involve active consultation and inclusion of "the public" in government and commercial innovation, the so-called deliberative and inclusionary processes (DIPs), such as consensus conferences and citizen juries. We suggest some measures that could be tried in Australia, which would take us further down the path of participation toward technological citizenship.
...More
Article
Dove, William;
Susman, Millard;
(2012)
James F. Crow (1916--2012)
(/isis/citation/CBB001320466/)
Article
Margaret A. Lemay;
(2020)
The Role of Expectations of Science in Shaping Research Policy: A Discursive Analysis of the Creation of Genome Canada
(/isis/citation/CBB425986451/)
Article
Beeson, Mark;
McDonald, Matt;
(2013)
The Politics of Climate Change in Australia
(/isis/citation/CBB001320849/)
Article
Phillip Nagley;
(2019)
Anthony William Linnane 1930–2017
(/isis/citation/CBB994261209/)
Book
Rasmussen, Carolyn;
Danks, Alister;
(2010)
Double Helix, Double Joy: David Danks, the Father of Clinical Genetics in Australia
(/isis/citation/CBB001033737/)
Article
Hunter, Cecily;
Doyle, Colleen;
(2014)
Dementia Policy in Australia and the “Social Construction” of Infirm Old Age
(/isis/citation/CBB001421883/)
Article
Schibeci, Renato;
Harwood, Jeffrey;
(2007)
Stimulating Authentic Community Involvement in Biotechnology Policy in Australia
(/isis/citation/CBB000720044/)
Article
Christoff, Peter;
(2013)
Climate Discourse Complexes, National Climate Regimes and Australian Climate Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001320850/)
Book
Cary, Geoffrey;
Dovers, Stephen;
Lindenmayer, David;
(2003)
Australia Burning: Fire Ecology, Policy and Management Issues
(/isis/citation/CBB000502370/)
Article
Barns, Ian;
Schibeci, Renato;
Davison, Aidan;
Shaw, Robyn;
(2000)
“What do you think about genetic medicine?” Facilitating sociable public discourse on developments in the new genetics
(/isis/citation/CBB000110115/)
Article
Escobar, Maria Paula;
Demeritt, David;
(2014)
Flooding and the Framing of Risk in British Broadsheets, 1985--2010
(/isis/citation/CBB001420076/)
Article
Quet, Mathieu;
(2014)
Science to the People! (and Experimental Politics): Searching for the Roots of Participatory Discourse in Science and Technology in the 1970s in France
(/isis/citation/CBB001420108/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy [Review Essay Number 1500174]
(/isis/citation/CBB001500176/)
Article
Mettens, Philippe;
(2007)
La politique scientifique belge du décollage national à la vitesse de croisière fédérale
(/isis/citation/CBB001024467/)
Article
Kerr, Anne;
Cunningham-Burley, Sarah;
Tutton, Richard;
(2007)
Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue
(/isis/citation/CBB000780233/)
Article
Saito, Hirofumi;
Aleksandr Alekseevich Semenov;
(2019)
How Was Biology Education Reformed in Russia after the Lysenko Period?
(/isis/citation/CBB489085804/)
Book
Samia Salem;
(2013)
Die öffentliche Wahrnehmung der Gentechnik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland seit den 1960er Jahren
(/isis/citation/CBB387693913/)
Essay Review
Irzik, Gürol;
Kurtulmus, A Faik;
(2013)
Votes and Lab Coats: Democratizing Scientific Research and Science Policy
(/isis/citation/CBB001500174/)
Book
Douglas, Heather E.;
(2009)
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
(/isis/citation/CBB001031636/)
Article
Nowotny, Helga;
Scott, Peter;
Gibbons, Michael;
(2003)
Introduction: “Mode 2” Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge
(/isis/citation/CBB000780249/)
Be the first to comment!