Article ID: CBB000410733

Common Ancestry and Natural Selection (2003)

unapi

We explore the evidential relationships that connect two standard claims of modern evolutionary biology. The hypothesis of common ancestry (which says that all organisms now on earth trace back to a single progenitor) and the hypothesis of natural selection (which says that natural selection has been an important influence on the traits exhibited by organisms) are logically independent; however, this leaves open whether testing one requires assumptions about the status of the other. Darwin noted that an extreme version of adaptationism would undercut the possibility of making inferences about common ancestry. Here we develop a converse claim-hypotheses that assert that natural selection has been an important influence on trait values are untestable unless supplemented by suitable background assumptions. The fact of common ancestry and a claim about quantitative genetics together suffice to render such hypotheses testable. Furthermore, we see no plausible alternative to these assumptions; we hypothesize that they are necessary as well as sufficient for adaptive hypotheses to be tested. This point has important implications for biological practice, since biologists standardly assume that adaptive hypotheses predict trait associations among tip species. Another consequence is that adaptive hypotheses cannot be confirmed or disconfirmed by a trait value that is universal within a single species, if that trait value deviates even slightly from the optimum. 1 Two Darwinian hypotheses 2 Logical independence 3 How adaptive hypotheses bear on the tree of life hypothesis 4 How the tree of life hypothesis bears on adaptive hypotheses 5 What do adaptive hypotheses predict? 6 Common ancestry and quantitative genetics to the rescue 7 Conclusion

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB000410733/

Similar Citations

Article Pierrick Bourrat; (2020)
Natural selection and the reference grain problem (/isis/citation/CBB530242611/)

Article Birch, Jonathan; (2012)
The Negative View of Natural Selection (/isis/citation/CBB001221639/)

Article Miguel García-Valdecasas; Terrence W. Deacon; (2024)
Biological functions are causes, not effects: A critique of selected effects theories (/isis/citation/CBB854874311/)

Article Jonathan Birch; (2019)
Inclusive fitness as a criterion for improvement (/isis/citation/CBB535828538/)

Article James DiFrisco; (2017)
Functional explanation and the problem of functional equivalence (/isis/citation/CBB378954890/)

Article Vermaas, Pieter E.; Houkes, Wybo; (2003)
Ascribing Functions to Technical Artefacts: A Challenge to Etiological Accounts of Functions (/isis/citation/CBB000410725/)

Article Matthen, Mohan; (2003)
Is Sex Really Necessary? And Other Questions for Lewens (/isis/citation/CBB000410727/)

Thesis Goldstein, Adam; (2006)
Random Drift: Chance and Explanation in Evolutionary Biology (/isis/citation/CBB001561699/)

Article Cédric Paternotte; (2020)
Social evolution and the individual-as-maximising-agent analogy (/isis/citation/CBB692281691/)

Article Hugh Desmond; (2018)
Natural selection, plasticity, and the rationale for largest-scale trends (/isis/citation/CBB970270245/)

Article Alan Grafen; (2019)
Should we ask for more than consistency of Darwinism with Mendelism? (/isis/citation/CBB453166142/)

Book Ruse, Michael; Travis, Joseph; (2009)
Evolution: The First Four Billion Years (/isis/citation/CBB001232307/)

Article Philippe Huneman; (2019)
Revisiting Darwinian teleology: A case for inclusive fitness as design explanation (/isis/citation/CBB392966411/)

Article Brian McLoone; (2020)
Population and organismal perspectives on trait origins (/isis/citation/CBB139456486/)

Article Razeto-Barry, Pablo; Frick, Ramiro; (2011)
Probabilistic Causation and the Explanatory Role of Natural Selection (/isis/citation/CBB001024019/)

Article André Ariew; Collin Rice; Yasha Rohwer; (2015)
Autonomous-Statistical Explanations and Natural Selection (/isis/citation/CBB996717651/)

Book Brzezinski Prestes, Maria Elice; Martins, Lilian Al-Chueyr Pereira; Stefano, Waldir; (2006)
Filosofia e História da Biologia 1 (/isis/citation/CBB000820181/)

Book Creath, Richard; Maienschein, Jane; (2000)
Biology and epistemology (/isis/citation/CBB000110573/)

Thesis Eugene, Earnshaw-Whyte.; (2012)
Modeling Evolution (/isis/citation/CBB001567349/)

Authors & Contributors
Birch, Jonathan
Ariew, André
Brzezinski Prestes, María Elice de
Creath, Richard
Flannery, Michael A.
Frick, Ramiro
Journals
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
Publishers
University of Toronto
Cambridge University Press
Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Fundo Mackenzie de Pesquisa
Johns Hopkins University
University of Alabama Press
Concepts
Biology
Evolution
Philosophy of biology
Natural selection
Adaptation (biology)
Explanation; hypotheses; theories
People
Darwin, Charles Robert
Hempel, Carl G.
Jennings, Herbert Spencer
Mill, John Stuart
Senebier, Jean
Wallace, Alfred Russel
Time Periods
19th century
20th century
21st century
18th century
20th century, early
Places
England
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment