The second International Knowledge and Discourse Conference, held at the University of Hong Kong in June 2002, was the forum for the long-awaited debate between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller. Bruno Latour counts beyond two. He places the blame for the emphasis in academia on the subject-object distinction on Kant. Latour wants academics to acknowledge that things act, and suggests we look at other traditions, e.g. the Chinese, for alternatives to the subject-object dichotomy. Steve Fuller concentrated on the moral project of science, which is to draw a distinction between the human and the non-human and, to highlight the fact that, as the culmination of the sciences, social science has a particular responsibility to make this distinction. He accused Bruno Latour of evading the moral issue. The debate can be read as a reiteration of the postions of Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller on the question of heterogeneity at the theoretical level, but it did not address the topic at the practical or research level.
...MoreDescription Regarding a debate between Bruno Latour and Steve Fuller on the subject-object distinction and the moral project of science.
Chapter
Uus, Undo;
(2001)
The Glory and Misery of Modern Science
(/isis/citation/CBB000102685/)
Article
Shapin, Steven;
(2012)
The Sciences of Subjectivity
(/isis/citation/CBB001250744/)
Article
Mouzelis, Nicos;
(2000)
The Subjectivist-Objectivist Divide: Against Transcendence
(/isis/citation/CBB000110012/)
Book
Esha Shah;
(2018)
Who Is the Scientist-Subject?: Affective History of the Gene
(/isis/citation/CBB881962010/)
Chapter
Zittel, Claus;
(2010)
The Politics of Cognition: Genesis and Development of Ludwik Fleck's “Comparative Epistemology”
(/isis/citation/CBB001023239/)
Book
Parsons, Keith M.;
(2014)
It Started with Copernicus: Vital Questions about Science
(/isis/citation/CBB001510107/)
Article
Isabel Waidner;
(2018)
Christian Bök's Xenotext Experiment, Conceptual Writing and the Subject-of-No-Subjectivity: "Pink Faeries and Gaudy Baubles"
(/isis/citation/CBB611832394/)
Book
Debru, Claude;
Nouvel, Pascal;
(2003)
Le possible et les biotechnologies: Essai de philosophie dans les sciences
(/isis/citation/CBB000772845/)
Article
Webster, W. R.;
(2002)
Wavelength Theory of Colour Strikes Back: The Return of the Physical
(/isis/citation/CBB000202905/)
Article
Toader, Iulian D.;
(2013)
Concept Formation and Scientific Objectivity: Weyl's Turn against Husserl
(/isis/citation/CBB001320797/)
Thesis
Intemann, Kristen K.;
(2004)
Should Science Be Value-Free? Rethinking the Role of Ethical and Political Values in the Justification of Scientific Theories
(/isis/citation/CBB001562070/)
Book
Evandro Agazzi;
(2014)
Scientific Objectivity and Its Contexts
(/isis/citation/CBB896368292/)
Book
Lacey, Hugh;
(2005)
Values and Objectivity in Science: The Current Controversy about Transgenic Crops
(/isis/citation/CBB000601025/)
Chapter
Evandro Agazzi;
(2016)
Il valore culturale della scienza
(/isis/citation/CBB882918228/)
Article
Lott, Micah;
(2013)
Does Human Nature Conflict with Itself?: Human Form and the Harmony of the Virtues
(/isis/citation/CBB001201752/)
Chapter
Dodd, Adam;
(2013)
Popular Entomology and Anthropomorphism in the Nineteenth Century: L. M. Budgen's Episodes of Insect Life
(/isis/citation/CBB001500480/)
Article
István Rév;
(2019)
Neither Objective nor Subjective
(/isis/citation/CBB495362445/)
Article
Langlitz, Nicolas;
(2010)
The Persistence of the Subjective in Neuropsychopharmacology: Observations of Contemporary Hallucinogen Research
(/isis/citation/CBB000953790/)
Thesis
Watson, Cecelia Alexandre;
(2011)
William James and John La Farge: The Search for Truth in Art, Science, and Philosophy
(/isis/citation/CBB001567324/)
Article
Anna Lindemann;
(2019)
Scientific Objectivity and Subjectivity in Eighteenth Century Pharmacology
(/isis/citation/CBB343956899/)
Be the first to comment!