Concept ID: CBA000116346

Objectivity

Show 141 citations related to Objectivity
Show 141 citations related to Objectivity as a subject or category


Description Term used during the period 2002-present

Permalink
data.isiscb.org/isis/authority/CBA000116346
Publications timeline | Click to expand
Updated timeline is loading. Please wait. The server may be processing several jobs...
Related places (List view)

Related Citations

Article Greg Lusk (2021)
Does democracy require value-neutral science? Analyzing the legitimacy of scientific information in the political sphere. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 102-110). (/isis/citation/CBB689424823/) unapi

Article Pietro Gori (2021)
Ernst Mach’s Contribution to the Philosophy of Science in Light of Mary B. Hesse’s Postempiricism. HOPOS (pp. 383-411). (/isis/citation/CBB711827914/) unapi

Article Luca Sciortino (2021)
The emergence of objectivity: Fleck, Foucault, Kuhn and Hacking. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 128-137). (/isis/citation/CBB779990178/) unapi

Book John Zerilli (2021)
A Citizen's Guide to Artificial Intelligence. (/isis/citation/CBB926539601/) unapi

Article Thomas Krendl Gilbert; Andrew Loveridge (February 2021)
Subjectifying objectivity: Delineating tastes in theoretical quantum gravity research. Social Studies of Science (pp. 73-99). (/isis/citation/CBB805036052/) unapi

Article Inkeri Koskinen (2020)
Defending a Risk Account of Scientific Objectivity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (pp. 1187-1207). (/isis/citation/CBB110063225/) unapi

Article Ryan O'Loughlin (2020)
Seepage, objectivity, and climate science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (pp. 74-81). (/isis/citation/CBB345549980/) unapi

Article Cerea, Alessandra (2020)
Rendere visibile la psiche. Bohr, Freud e Devereux: lo scienziato da spettatore ad attore. Physis: Rivista Intemazionale di Storia della Scienza. (/isis/citation/CBB942266782/) unapi

Book Paul Needham (2020)
Getting to Know the World Scientifically: An Objective View. (/isis/citation/CBB166825152/) unapi

Article Pietro Daniel Omodeo (2020)
The Struggle for Objectivity: Gramsci’s Historical-Political Vistas on Science against the Background of Lenin’s Epistemology. HOST: Journal of History of Science and Technology (pp. 13-49). (/isis/citation/CBB011713085/) unapi

Article Jeremy Dunham (2020)
On the Experience of Activity: William James's Late Metaphysics and the Influence of Nineteenth-Century French Spiritualism. Journal of the History of Philosophy (pp. 267-291). (/isis/citation/CBB920277441/) unapi

Book Mansoor Niaz (2019)
Evolving Nature of Objectivity in the History of Science and its Implications for Science Education. (/isis/citation/CBB181627786/) unapi

Article Anna Lindemann (2019)
Scientific Objectivity and Subjectivity in Eighteenth Century Pharmacology. Perspectives on Science (pp. 787-809). (/isis/citation/CBB343956899/) unapi

Book Miriam L. Kingsberg Kadia (2019)
Into the Field: Human Scientists of Transwar Japan. (/isis/citation/CBB545620371/) unapi

Article István Rév (2019)
Neither Objective nor Subjective. Centaurus: International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science, and Technology (pp. 143-152). (/isis/citation/CBB495362445/) unapi

Book Esha Shah (2018)
Who Is the Scientist-Subject?: Affective History of the Gene. (/isis/citation/CBB881962010/) unapi

Article Isabel Waidner (2018)
Christian Bök's Xenotext Experiment, Conceptual Writing and the Subject-of-No-Subjectivity: "Pink Faeries and Gaudy Baubles". Configurations: A Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology (pp. 27-46). (/isis/citation/CBB611832394/) unapi

Thesis Matthew Steckle (2018)
Situating Feminist Standpoint Theory: Toward a Critical Ontology of Knowledge. (/isis/citation/CBB862963001/) unapi

Article Hagop A. Yacoubian; Layan Al-Khatib; Taline Mardirossian (2017)
Analysis of the Image of Scientists Portrayed in the Lebanese National Science Textbooks. Science and Education (pp. 513-528). (/isis/citation/CBB087426117/) unapi

Article Saana Jukola (2017)
On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research – A comment on Stegenga. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences (pp. 35-41). (/isis/citation/CBB309655322/) unapi

Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment