Show
143 citations
related to Philosophers of science, modern
Show
143 citations
related to Philosophers of science, modern as a subject or category
Description Term used during the period 2002-present
Book
Antonio Lizzadri
(2023)
Dal realismo scientifico al realismo interno. Putnam verso il pragmatismo.
(/isis/citation/CBB914532866/)
Article
Mott T. Greene; George Gale
(2022)
Henry R. Frankel (1944–2019).
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
(pp. 157-159).
(/isis/citation/CBB444676328/)
Article
Stephen J. Dick
(2022)
Reminiscences of an eclectic historian–astronomer.
Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage
(pp. 99-137).
(/isis/citation/CBB295958606/)
Article
Markus Seidel
(2021)
Kuhn’s two accounts of rational disagreement in science: an interpretation and critique.
Synthese
(pp. 6023-6051).
(/isis/citation/CBB811083686/)
Book
K. Brad Wray
(2021)
Interpreting Kuhn: Critical Essays.
(/isis/citation/CBB103514339/)
Book
Francesco Crapanzano
(2021)
La scienza antica come filosofia: Pierre-Maxime Schuhl.
(/isis/citation/CBB146544017/)
Article
Marij van Strien
(2020)
Pluralism and anarchism in quantum physics: Paul Feyerabend's writings on quantum physics in relation to his general philosophy of science.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
(pp. 72-81).
(/isis/citation/CBB348944318/)
Article
Tamar Schneider
(2020)
Can We Talk About Feminist Epistemic Values Beyond Gender? Lessons from the Gut Microbiome.
Biological Theory
(pp. 25-38).
(/isis/citation/CBB112503055/)
Article
David M. Peña-Guzmán
(2020)
French historical epistemology: Discourse, concepts, and the norms of rationality.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
(pp. 68-76).
(/isis/citation/CBB928733497/)
Article
Francesco Luzzini
(2019)
Distorsioni bibliografiche e storture etiche. Le pubblicazioni di storia della scienza nel contesto italiano.
Il Protagora: Rivista di Filosofia e Cultura fondata da Bruno Widmar
(pp. 327-340).
(/isis/citation/CBB996363028/)
Article
Rachel Cooper; Roger Blashfield
(2018)
The myth of Hempel and the DSM-III.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
(pp. 10-19).
(/isis/citation/CBB266784900/)
Book
Piero Martinetti; Luca Natali
(2018)
Le carte di Piero Martinetti.
(/isis/citation/CBB915909435/)
Article
Francesco Luzzini
(2018)
Bibliographical Distortions, Distortive Habits: Contextualizing Italian Publications in the History of Science.
Isis: International Review Devoted to the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences
(pp. 1-13).
(/isis/citation/CBB924784770/)
Chapter
Simon Mazauric
(2017)
Le continuisme de Duhem en questions.
In: Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(pp. 133-152).
(/isis/citation/CBB238568481/)
Chapter
Carlo Vinti
(2017)
Duhem–Bachelard: per un confronto.
In: Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(pp. 233-258).
(/isis/citation/CBB098147354/)
Chapter
Jean-François Stoffel
(2017)
L’interprétation de l’«affaire Galilée» élaborée par Paul Mansion a–t–elle influencé Pierre Duhem?.
In: Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(pp. 153-184).
(/isis/citation/CBB304403940/)
Book
Mirella Fortino
(2017)
Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo.
(/isis/citation/CBB718409602/)
Chapter
Stefano Bordoni
(2017)
Pierre Duhem 1891-1896. Dalla fisica teorica alla storia e filosofia della scienza.
In: Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(pp. 59-79).
(/isis/citation/CBB719226825/)
Chapter
Krzysztof Szlachcic
(2017)
Il complesso meccanismo di ricezione della filosofia della scienza di Pierre Duhem. Il caso della tradizione filosofica polacca.
In: Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(pp. 185-208).
(/isis/citation/CBB564830118/)
Chapter
Francesco Calemi
(2017)
Sottodeterminazione e leggi di natura: Osservazioni sulla tesi Duhem–Quine.
In: Pierre Duhem: Verità, ragione e metodo
(pp. 97-107).
(/isis/citation/CBB568450738/)
Be the first to comment!