Concept ID: CBA000113934

Cartesianism

Show 140 citations related to Cartesianism
Show 140 citations related to Cartesianism as a subject or category


Description Term used during the period 2002-present

Permalink
data.isiscb.org/isis/authority/CBA000113934
Publications timeline | Click to expand
Updated timeline is loading. Please wait. The server may be processing several jobs...
Related places (List view)

Related Citations

Chapter Leen Spruit (2022)
Le verità di fede nella controversia tra Giovanni Battista De Benedictis e i suoi avversari. In: I demoni di Napoli: Naturale, preternaturale, sovrannaturale a Napoli e nell’Europa di età moderna (pp. 43-64). (/isis/citation/CBB890613773/) unapi

Article Ioana Bujor (2021)
Johannes Amerpoel and Géraud de Cordemoy: The Meaning of nefesh in Two Cartesian Reconstructions of Genesis I. Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas (pp. 1-34). (/isis/citation/CBB773134335/) unapi

Article Kevin Jang (2021)
Nicolaus Steno and the Cartesian Brain. Medicina Historica (pp. 1-8). (/isis/citation/CBB575163588/) unapi

Article Mihnea Dobre (2020)
Jacques Rohault’s Mathematical Physics. HOPOS (pp. 414-439). (/isis/citation/CBB922054924/) unapi

Article Harry Smit (2020)
The Cartesian Conception of the Development of the Mind and Its Neo-Aristotelian Alternative. Biological Theory (pp. 107-120). (/isis/citation/CBB675907450/) unapi

Article James Williams (2020)
Humanity, Technology, and Nature: A Recipe for Crises?. Icon: Journal of the International Committee for the History of Technology (pp. 8-28). (/isis/citation/CBB162974913/) unapi

Article Susana Gómez López (2020)
Enthusiasm and Platonic furor in the Origins of Cartesian Science: The Olympian Dreams. Early Science and Medicine: A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period (pp. 507-535). (/isis/citation/CBB520853246/) unapi

Article Aaron Spink (2020)
Cartesian Anti-Astrology. Lias: Sources and Documents Relating to the Early Modern History of Ideas (pp. 175-194). (/isis/citation/CBB966463876/) unapi

Book Édouard Mehl (2019)
Descartes en Allemagne 1619-1620: Le contexte allemand de l'élaborationde la science cartésienne. (/isis/citation/CBB408127344/) unapi

Article Christophe Schmit (2019)
Annexe. Édition critique commentée de manuscrits inédits de Philippe de La Hire : « Défense du système de M. Descartes sur le flux et le reflux de la mer ». Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences (pp. 352-370). (/isis/citation/CBB581203374/) unapi

Essay Review Martine Pécharman (2018)
Roger Ariew and "The First Cartesians". Perspectives on Science. (/isis/citation/CBB665136789/) unapi

Essay Review Tad M. Schmaltz (2018)
French Cartesian Scholasticism: Remarks on Descartes and the First Cartesians. Perspectives on Science. (/isis/citation/CBB407597122/) unapi

Essay Review Sophie Roux (2018)
Everything You Always Wanted to Know About the Summa quadripartita that Descartes Never Wrote. Perspectives on Science. (/isis/citation/CBB726490017/) unapi

Essay Review Domenico Collacciani (2018)
A Contextualist History of Cartesian Philosophy: Roger Ariew's Descartes and the First Cartesians. Perspectives on Science. (/isis/citation/CBB018190213/) unapi

Essay Review Lucian Petrescu (2018)
Scholastic Logic and Cartesian Logic. Perspectives on Science. (/isis/citation/CBB453047403/) unapi

Essay Review Roger Ariew (2018)
Descartes and the First Cartesians Revisited. Perspectives on Science. (/isis/citation/CBB300714807/) unapi

Article Eric Jorink; Huib Zuidervaart (2018)
Inleiding: Johannes Hudde (1628–1704), ‘groot ende onvergelykelyk wiskunstenaar’. Studium: Tijdschrift voor Wetenschaps- en Universiteitgeschiedenis (pp. 1-14). (/isis/citation/CBB738686773/) unapi

Article Aaron Spink (2018)
The Experimental Physics of Jacques Rohault. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (pp. 850-870). (/isis/citation/CBB768305096/) unapi

Article Giovanni Gellera (2018)
A “Calvinist” Theory of Matter? Burgersdijk and Descartes on Res extensa. Intellectual History Review (pp. 255-270). (/isis/citation/CBB063866130/) unapi

Article Raphaële Andrault (2018)
The Mind–Body Problem and the Role of Pain: Cross-Fire Between Leibniz and His Cartesian Readers. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (pp. 25-45). (/isis/citation/CBB247713160/) unapi

Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment