Article ID: CBB408350448

‘Dirty Work’, but Someone Has to Do It: Howard P. Robertson and the Refereeing Practices of Physical Review in the 1930s (2016)

unapi

In the 1930s the mathematical physicist Howard P. Robertson was the main referee of the journal Physical Review for papers concerning general relativity and related subjects. The rich correspondence between Robertson and the editors of the journal enables a historical investigation of the refereeing process of Physical Review at the time that it was becoming one of the most influential physics periodicals in the world. By focusing on this case study, the paper investigates two complementary aspects of the evolution of the refereeing process: first, the historical evolution of the refereeing practices in connection with broader contextual changes, and second, the attempts to define the activity of the referee, including the epistemic virtues required and the journal's functions according to the participants' categories. By exploring the tension between Robertson's idealized picture about how the referee should behave and the desire to promote his intellectual agenda, I show that the evaluation criteria that Robertson employed were contextually dependent and I argue that, in the 1930s, through his reports the referee had an enormous power in defining what direction future research should take.

...More
Citation URI
https://data.isiscb.org/isis/citation/CBB408350448/

Similar Citations

Article Brush, Stephen G.; (2002)
Peer Review Materials for Physical Review (/isis/citation/CBB000340286/)

Article Rekdal, Ole Bjørn; (2014)
Academic Urban Legends (/isis/citation/CBB001421187/)

Book Franklin, Allan; (2013)
Shifting Standards: Experiments in Particle Physics in the Twentieth Century (/isis/citation/CBB001500041/)

Article Siegmund-Schultze, Reinhard; (2007)
Einsteins Nachruf auf Emmy Noether in der New York Times, 1935 (/isis/citation/CBB001036207/)

Article Saana Jukola; (2017)
A Social Epistemological Inquiry into Biases in Journal Peer Review (/isis/citation/CBB482680482/)

Article Redner, Sidney; (2005)
Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review (/isis/citation/CBB000540038/)

Article Hirschauer, Stefan; (2010)
Editorial Judgments: A Praxeology of “Voting” in Peer Review (/isis/citation/CBB000953625/)

Article Koen Vermier; (2022)
Opening up the History of Science: A Perspective from Centaurus (/isis/citation/CBB090865174/)

Article Sergio Sismondo; (August 2016)
Editorial: Sorting on arXiv: Introduction to an ad hoc section (/isis/citation/CBB354042804/)

Chapter Buchwald, Jed Z.; (2003)
The Scholar's Seeing Eye (/isis/citation/CBB000330810/)

Chapter Gläser, Jochen; Lange, Stefan; Laudel, Grit; Schimank, Uwe; (2010)
Informed Authority? The Limited Use of Research Evaluation Systems for Managerial Control in Universities (/isis/citation/CBB001420859/)

Book Forsdyke, Donald Roy; (2000)
Tomorrow's Cures Today? How to Reform the Health Research System (/isis/citation/CBB000101426/)

Article Baldwin, Melinda Clare; (2015)
Credibility, Peer Review, and Nature, 1945--1990 (/isis/citation/CBB001552651/)

Authors & Contributors
Jukola, Saana
Benjamin Newman
Pierandrea Lo Nostro
Sismondo, Sergio
Koen Vermier
Zund, Joseph D.
Concepts
Peer review
Periodicals; serials
Physics
Scientific communities; interprofessional relations
Public understanding of science
Communication of scientific ideas
Time Periods
20th century
21st century
19th century
20th century, late
20th century, early
Places
United States
Germany
Australia
Great Britain
Africa
Institutions
Royal Society of London
Royal Geographical Society
American Physical Society
American Institute of Physics
Comments

Be the first to comment!

{{ comment.created_by.username }} on {{ comment.created_on | date:'medium' }}

Log in or register to comment